Route selection
Compare alternatives across chemistry, supply, safety, waste and delivery constraints.
Research area 02
From a plausible transformation to a safe, selective and transferable synthetic route.
Finding a reaction is only the beginning. The group evaluates chemistry as a connected route, considering starting materials, step count, selectivity, kinetics, hazards, work-up, impurity control, sustainability and translation to useful scale.
Scientific questions
Which retrosynthetic route offers the best balance of feasibility, safety, cost and material efficiency?
What reaction variables determine selectivity, robustness and impurity formation?
Can operations be telescoped or redesigned to remove isolations and reduce waste?
How should a process be translated from discovery conditions into a practical operating window?
Established expertise
These themes reflect the group’s established scientific record. Availability for a new project depends on scope, collaborators, funding and the practical requirements of the work.
Approach
Chemistry, evidence and technology are considered together, with methods selected for scientific value rather than novelty alone.
Compare alternatives across chemistry, supply, safety, waste and delivery constraints.
Map critical variables, failure modes and robust operating windows.
Connect laboratory performance with equipment, work-up and scale requirements.
Representative applications
Future research direction
The next programme will explore integrated route evaluation in which retrosynthetic options, experimental evidence, process metrics and scale constraints are considered together rather than as separate late-stage activities.
View the future programmeCollaboration opportunity
Suitable collaborations include difficult route selection, inefficient legacy synthesis, impurity or robustness problems, hazardous operations and early assessment of batch-to-flow feasibility.
Start a conversation